Jump to content

User talk:Adamant1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Archive

Hi. Please advise. --Krd 07:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: I fixed the licenses on the couple of files that were left from the import. The few that I didn't were copyrighted and the rest of the images are from someone else. Although it looks like they could be licensed as "PD-USGov" but I'll leave @SecretName101: to fix it if they want to. Otherwise you can delete the remaining files. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Krd 10:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) I just used a batch approach to correctly tag a bunch of the ones from Department of Veterans Affairs. - Jmabel ! talk 18:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see now that some may have been double-tagged, because someone else already added the correct tag without using the warning. But I think that is relatively harmless. - Jmabel ! talk 18:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And there are more where BotMultichillT has added the correct tag without using the warning, that I'm not going to be easily able to fix. So Krd, be really careful about any deletion here, because there are a bunch of correctly tagged Department of Veterans Affairs files in Category:Media without a license as of 30 April 2025. - Jmabel ! talk 18:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

[edit]

--Yann (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "First Yann falsely reports me for supposedly making threats on his talk page. Then when I respond to him insulting and threating me by pointing out mistakes he's made in the past I get blocked for intimidation and harassment. This is clearly harassment and an abuse of the administrator privileges on his end. He's just abusing the tools because his retaliatory ANU complaint didn't go anywhere. He has a history of unliterally blocking me over non-issues and without consensus. This is just more of the same retaliatory, bullying behavior because he's ANU complaint didn't get any traction."
Unblock reason: "Procedural closure of this unblock request as Yann already lifted it. Bedivere (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

I do not think Yann was an appropriate person to block this user; for very similar reasons, I would not be an appropriate person to unblock, so I'm leaving it at this comment. - Jmabel ! talk 20:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to agree, Yann is far too involved. If there was any real acute need for this, Yann should have requested it through the relevant channels and had some other admin do it. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The block was definitely formally incorrect. Based on the reasons I would consider the block justified. As basically every admin on Commons is involved here in some way I would propose to give this case to the U4C. GPSLeo (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not super up on how the U4C works. Nor do I know how to file a request. Perhaps @King of Hearts: can look at it since he's not involved and reverted a similar block a few years ago. I generally have respect for his opinion. I'm more then willing to just drop it or take a week off if he reblocks me and we all agree that it was inapropriate for Yann to do the block. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I think this diff by Alachuckthebuck should be considered along with it. They make a couple of good points. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1 I want to notify you that I now created the U4C case m:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/User conduct and block review where Commons admins are to involved. GPSLeo (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK I unblocked Adamant1 as being involved. However the reason for the block remains. Yann (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GPSLeo: Just to throw it out there since you started the administrator discussion about adding this to the U4C case, but there's been more then a couple of times where Yann blocked people that he was involved in disputes with, me included. A lot of this wouldn't have happened on my side if you guys were more serious about dealing with administrator misconduct. Regardless, there's clearly a problem with Yann using his privileges in an inappropriate way. So I think it would be worth getting the U4C involved since it doesn't seem to be something the community is willing to, or capable of, dealing with. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For that we first need a local discussion about a de-admin process against Yann. Only after opening a de-admin voting was declined by local bureaucrats the U4C would take this case as all local procedures have to be used first. GPSLeo (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@GPSLeo: Someone should do it then. I would but I'm to involved and you have to be the literally reincarnation of Jesus for anyone to take complaints about administrators seriously on here. Going by the comments on his talk page it doesn't seem like he cares or thinks it's a problem though. I can't say I blame him considering how much he's been coddled over the whole thing but it's a chronic issue and someone with that kind of an unserious, self-entitled attitude has no business being an administrator. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1: This is really not the sort of discussion you should be engaged in here while blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 19:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I wasn't sure since people are allowed to discuss things around the block. I'll refrain from it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


@Chris.sherlock2: Just an FYI, but I reported Yann for INVOLVED editing before and I just get attacked. The same thing happened when I emailed a couple of administrators asking them how to deal with the issue. I don't remember the exact conversations, but I've also asked Yann to back off me several times. He wasn't willing to. So this seemed like the only way to deal with it given that nothing else worked. Could I have approached the whole thing better? Sure, but Yann had several opportunities to back off on his end. Otherwise, it should have been dealt with by other administrators or the community before it got to this point. This is just what happens when complaints about administrators are handwaved as crying wolf and are dismissed as conspiracy theories. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

[edit]

--Bedivere (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere: I sent you an email. I'd appreciate it if you read it and wrote me a response or at least me know if you didn't get it. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Will have a look later today, I haven't checked that email. Bedivere (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the block reason in order to just link to the full thread at the ANU. Have a good day Bedivere (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 17:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: Someone can transfer my comment over to the ANU complaint if they want to, but I was in the process of going through the files from the import and nominating the small number that were copyrighted for deletion when the whole thing with Yann happened. Since @A.Savin: mentioned it in the ANU complaint, I imported 13000 files from Flickr, a small amount of which were copyrighted. I've been going through and dealing with the ones that were in the last couple of weeks. I wouldn't call it NOTHERE behavior since COPYVIO can sometimes be uploaded by accident as part of an import. It happens quite frequently with bots importing images from GLAMs. Know one is claiming they aren't here to build a media repository or having them blocked over it. At least I've been actively going through the files and nominating the ones that are copyrighted for deletion. Something bot owners usually don't bother to do. Of course I support deleting any images that violate copyright. Again, I was in the middle of nominating them for deletion when I was blocked. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding this. I wrote a similar remark at COM:AN before just now noticing this here. - Jmabel ! talk 01:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:- poster - advertising - spagna - print (54216433284).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 04:14, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:1985 - soviet poster - pace (54345750881).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 04:15, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interstate 90 & Route 45 (52519373065).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 04:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongful deletion and motivation

[edit]

You caused the deletion the multiple-years-old Category:Educational organizations of Italy as (incorrectly named) duplicate of the just-created Category:Educational organizations in Italy. Besides them not meaning the same thing ("of Italy" included Italian organizations abroad, eg. Category:Scuola Italiana Arturo Dell'Oro and other Category:Italian international schools, which are not "in Italy"), you also violated the guidelines. You should have just moved the older category keeping its page history, if the correct name was Category:Educational organizations in Italy (which is not). Please, refrain from such disruptive editing, or you may be blocked again. Daniele Fisichella 09:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Daniele Fisichella: Looks to me like a basic honest mistake, certainly not the type of thing anyone should be blocked for or literally everyone who works significantly with categories would be subject to blocking.
I hope it is not too hard for you to fix. Normally I'd expect Adamant1 to fix it, but he's blocked.
When you fix it, please add hat notes with {{Distinguish}} or something similar. This is a very subtle distinction that anyone could have missed. - Jmabel ! talk 17:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I love your good faith, but I'm quite sure that was intentional, not something he missed. There was no reason at all to delete the page history of a multiple-years-old category in favour of one he had personally just created. Not to mention Category:Educational organizations of Italy explicitly included the Italian international schools and was perfectly coherent with its category tree, including the educational organizations "of Australia", "of Belarus", "of Canada", "of France", "of Israel", "of Japan", "of Poland", "of Portugal", "of South Korea", "of Taiwan", "of Uruguay", "of Uzbekistan", as well as the Aviation organizations "of Italy", Companies "of Italy", Cultural organizations "of Italy", Employers' organizations "of Italy", Environmental organizations "of Italy", Foundations (organizations) "of Italy", Government agencies "of Italy", Government organizations "of Italy", Guilds "of Italy", Human nutrition organizations "of Italy", Law enforcement agencies "of Italy", Political organizations "of Italy", Religious organizations "of Italy", and many others he never cared about; yet he cared quite enough about the deletion of a multiple-years-old category labeled as an "incorrectly named duplicate" of one he had personally just created. Let me say the benefit of the doubt is very thin here. Daniele Fisichella 20:18, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:? SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (3677382186).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kufu TNS OR-X Eastbay Graffiti Art Family Guy (2360799962).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steel MSK AWR 7thLetter SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (2360822174).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lango SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (2360850646).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:King157 UFW Oakland Graffiti Art Close-Up (3146360565).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petaluma Graffiti Art (3149161462).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krash TDK BSK Oakland Graffiti Art (3150211348).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serch ZF TM7 Exchange SeventhLetter MSK AWR SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (1527190914).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kacao77 TNS Exchange SeventhLetter MSK AWR SanFrancisco Graffiti Art Close-Up (1526322095).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kacao77 Exchange SeventhLetter MSK AWR SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (1527171308).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aroe MSK HA SanFrancisco Graffiti Art "Exchange Wall" (1527172472).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:King157 Oakland California Graffiti Art (1765993692).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti Moses...Meeting Of Styles 2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3301377201).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Mark Bode" M.O.S.2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3301387295).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:R.I.P.Dream TDK MeetingOfStyles 2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3302231732).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echo SanFrancisco Graffiti Art (3303136838).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kulture-Soldier MeetingOfStyles 2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3303167058).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Bode, M.O.S.2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3351106382).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picasso TWS M.O.S.2008 Oakland Graffiti Art (3351156298).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Old Soviet advertising (19) (54259929965).jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Old Soviet advertising (19) (54259929965).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've fixed the info on that file, added a PD-license, and requested renaming because it is clearly a Russian Empire advertisement of a company that operated from 1870 to 1915[1], not a Soviet era advertisement. Nakonana (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 04:34, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

[edit]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Not that there was an actual reason for the block to begin with, but it seems super pointless since I received a final warning and there's the UC4 case. Seriously, what am I going to do at this point? Blocks aren't suppose to be punitive. I'd like to go through the files I uploaded that have been nominated for deletion before they get deleted while I have the time over the weekend. So why not unblock me? Adamant1 (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2025 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "You were blocked for intimidation/harassment, but the unblock request does not mention that at all, so naturally it is declined. The block will expire after 2 days. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2025 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  Simple English  svenska  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

@Taivo: The block was supposedly for "intimidation and harassment" and said so but the reason was removed by Bedivere after I emailed him and explained things because I didn't harass Yann. Which is why it just links to the ANU complaint now. I don't think I should be blocked for something that essentially everyone in the ANU complaint, as well as the administrator who originally placed the block, agrees I didn't do. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Taivo declined the first unblock request because supposedly I was block for intimidation and harassment but didn't say so in the unblock request or something. The block reason just doesn't say that's what I was blocked for. It actually did say that but the reason was removed by Bedivere after I emailed him and explained things because I didn't harass or intimidate Yann. Which is why it just links to the ANU complaint now. Essentially everyone in the ANU complaint, as well as the blocking administrator, agrees I didn't harass Yann. It's not intimidation or harassment to make one edit restoring my own comment on a talk page. I shouldn't be blocked for something that's a non-issue and essentially know one thinks was harassing. Even if there's only two days left on the block. The short duration isn't a justification to keep it in place."
Decline reason: "Usually I do not want to review two somebody's unblock requests in a row, but now the block has expired. Happy editing! Taivo (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  Simple English  svenska  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Welcome back!

[edit]

That's it! 2804:14D:5C32:6193:B0CB:D883:3A5E:853E 06:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neckface & Me II (3363995912).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.175.185.48 21:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]